• Welcome to The Valparaiso Beacons Fan Zone Forum.
 

Seventies, Eighties, Nineties and introducing the Nullies

Started by bbtds, February 03, 2013, 10:53:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bbtds

I heard this on a clip from a British radio station that made up this term because they wanted to play songs from 2000 to 2009.  The Nullies.

What do you guys think of this term for the years 2000 to 2009?

covufan

Quote from: bbtds on February 03, 2013, 10:53:25 AM
I heard this on a clip from a British radio station that made up this term because they wanted to play songs from 2000 to 2009.  The Nullies.

What do you guys think of this term for the years 2000 to 2009?
or the 'oughts'

LaPorteAveApostle

i prefer "aughts" ... "nullies" sounds like something kids would say so that they can't get punched for farting, or flinching, etc.
"It is so easy to be proud, harsh, moody and selfish, but we have been created for greater things; why stoop down to things that will spoil the beauty of our hearts?" Bl. Mother Teresa

valpo04

Stations around here just say "the 80s, 90s and today!"

bbtds

Quote from: valpo04 on February 09, 2013, 06:34:28 AM
Stations around here just say "the 80s, 90s and today!"

But it isn't today any longer. That sounds like a song title.

For places like radio stations they must make a separation somewhere and that is usually between 2009 and 2010. I assume "today" will be called "the teens." 2000 to 2009-"the aughts." I guess I never liked it.

LaPorteAveApostle

Quote from: bbtds on February 09, 2013, 08:20:07 AM"the aughts."

that's what was used a hundred years ago, as in "setshot graduated from valpo in aught-nine".

as far as "and today!!!" it's pretty ridiculous when "today" is TWELVE YEARS LONG.
"It is so easy to be proud, harsh, moody and selfish, but we have been created for greater things; why stoop down to things that will spoil the beauty of our hearts?" Bl. Mother Teresa

wh

Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on February 09, 2013, 12:57:36 PM
Quote from: bbtds on February 09, 2013, 08:20:07 AM"the aughts."

that's what was used a hundred years ago, as in "setshot graduated from valpo in aught-nine".

as far as "and today!!!" it's pretty ridiculous when "today" is TWELVE YEARS LONG.

...or, 13 years and 2 months.  ;)

LaPorteAveApostle

"It is so easy to be proud, harsh, moody and selfish, but we have been created for greater things; why stoop down to things that will spoil the beauty of our hearts?" Bl. Mother Teresa

wh

Yeah, I think I knew that.  The context of the discussion stemmed from introduction by '04 of the phrase "80's, 90's and today."  "Today" began 13 years and 2 months ago.

LaPorteAveApostle

Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 01:14:48 PM"Today" began 13 years and 2 months ago.

Well, I would argue that if 2000 belonged to the previous millennium, then it certainly also belonged to the previous decade, making the 80s actually 81-90 and the 90s 91-00.  But that's just me.  I'm all about making sense of insignificant things.
"It is so easy to be proud, harsh, moody and selfish, but we have been created for greater things; why stoop down to things that will spoil the beauty of our hearts?" Bl. Mother Teresa

StlVUFan

Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on February 11, 2013, 03:45:40 PM
Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 01:14:48 PM"Today" began 13 years and 2 months ago.

Well, I would argue that if 2000 belonged to the previous millennium, then it certainly also belonged to the previous decade, making the 80s actually 81-90 and the 90s 91-00.  But that's just me.  I'm all about making sense of insignificant things.
My mindset as well, but "80's" sounds slightly different than identifying a decade, so I didn't bother to snark about it.

bbtds

Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on February 11, 2013, 03:45:40 PMI'm all about making sense of insignificant things.

The very thing that makes "scrutiny" this boards' middle name.

Oh yah, that name didn't work out that well.

wh

Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on February 11, 2013, 03:45:40 PM
Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 01:14:48 PM"Today" began 13 years and 2 months ago.

Well, I would argue that if 2000 belonged to the previous millennium, then it certainly also belonged to the previous decade, making the 80s actually 81-90 and the 90s 91-00.  But that's just me.  I'm all about making sense of insignificant things.

You would argue that the year 2000 is part of the 1990's?  No you wouldn't.

StlVUFan

Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 07:23:19 PM
Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on February 11, 2013, 03:45:40 PM
Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 01:14:48 PM"Today" began 13 years and 2 months ago.

Well, I would argue that if 2000 belonged to the previous millennium, then it certainly also belonged to the previous decade, making the 80s actually 81-90 and the 90s 91-00.  But that's just me.  I'm all about making sense of insignificant things.

You would argue that the year 2000 is part of the 1990's?  No you wouldn't.
Phraseology aside, I would absolutely argue that 2000 was the last year of the last millennium and the last year of the last decade of the last millennium.  The new millennium began on Jan. 1, 2001.

covufan

Quote from: StlVUFan on February 12, 2013, 01:49:36 AM
Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 07:23:19 PM
Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on February 11, 2013, 03:45:40 PM
Quote from: wh on February 11, 2013, 01:14:48 PM"Today" began 13 years and 2 months ago.

Well, I would argue that if 2000 belonged to the previous millennium, then it certainly also belonged to the previous decade, making the 80s actually 81-90 and the 90s 91-00.  But that's just me.  I'm all about making sense of insignificant things.

You would argue that the year 2000 is part of the 1990's?  No you wouldn't.
Phraseology aside, I would absolutely argue that 2000 was the last year of the last millennium and the last year of the last decade of the last millennium.  The new millennium began on Jan. 1, 2001.
Here is my take:  2000 was the last year of the last (previous) millennium.  2000 was the last year of the 20th century.  2000 was the last year of the 200th decade.  Both centuries and decades can also be thought of as 100 and 10 year periods.  This is why we have the 1800's, 1900's, 1980's, 1990's, etc.  The problem is using 1800's and 19th century to mean the same thing, which they are not.  We rarely use 200th, 201st decade monikers, so 80's, 90's, etc is AOK with me. 

I always telling someone that used the term "millennium bug" they were wrong on both counts.  It wasn't the millennium, nor was it a bug.  "Y2K Problem" was most correct.