The Valparaiso Beacons Fan Zone Forum

Valpo Sports => Valpo Basketball => Topic started by: wh on December 18, 2016, 10:34:19 PM

Title: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: wh on December 18, 2016, 10:34:19 PM
Fort Wayne wins again, but is that a good thing?
(By Tom Davis of The News-Sentinel)
Mastodons having trouble finding games due to growing success
Sunday, December 18, 2016 8:12 PM.

From the article:

"The coaches understand the quality of our basketball," Coffman said. "But I'm not sure that their fan bases do. Even with the top mid-majors in the Midwest, they're not psyched to play us because they know it is a quality game, if they care about their RPI it is good for their RPI, but their fan base doesn't necessarily recognize that."
Take Valparaiso for example.
The Crusaders are a dominant mid-major program (9-2 this season) with a potential NBA Draft pick (senior forward Alec Peters). In 12 of the past 13 seasons, Fort Wayne and Valpo have played each other, however, when Coffman called to schedule a game this season he got a familiar answer (from most programs), but a surprising one from Valpo.
"They had Alec Peters back," Coffman said, "they knew that they were going to be good this year, we've played that game (12 of the past 13 years), and they wouldn't play us this year."

Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: oklahomamick on December 19, 2016, 07:02:20 AM
Welcome to the table mastodons
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: NativeCheesehead on December 19, 2016, 07:25:15 AM
Did we disrespect Tom Davis' mother in the past? I mean seriously.  >:(
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: a3uge on December 19, 2016, 08:37:32 AM
This is most likely just Tom Davis being Tom Davis. Valpo was invited to the Las Vegas relatively early, and did successfully schedule Oregon and Kentucky as true road games. As Valpo learned last year, the selection committee doesn't really value road wins, so Valpo probably didn't want to head to Fort Wayne.

That or maybe Valpo scheduled a home and home vs Santa Clara instead because they wanted another west coast trip soon. There's a million factors that come into play when scheduling, so calling out Valpo for the one year they didn't play each other is pretty silly.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: justducky on December 19, 2016, 09:02:26 AM
I think wh may have thrown this out without his personal comment in anticipation of my response.

Yes I will get to it but later; and from time to time that Davis guy can accidentally be right!
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: VU2014 on December 19, 2016, 09:21:09 AM
Somebody tell him that I'm sure his acceptance letter to Valpo just got lost in the mail and to not take it so hard  :P
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: covufan on December 19, 2016, 09:52:40 AM
I would like to think that this was more of a scheduling problem this year and not a snub to IPFW.  I think that Valpo is trying to create basketball relationships with other schools in nearby region (Ball St, Indiana St this year), and that IPFW will be on the schedule in future years.  IPFW is a good basketball program and an away game at IPFW takes the team away from studies much less than other trips.  It is a good fit for both teams and should be pursued in the future.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: wh on December 19, 2016, 10:09:57 AM
Quote from: justducky on December 19, 2016, 09:02:26 AM
I think wh may have thrown this out without his personal comment in anticipation of my response.

Yes I will get to it but later; and from time to time that Davis guy can accidentally be right!

Quite honestly, I put it out without comment because I'm not sure exactly what to think about it. Hoping others will add some clarity.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: IndyValpo on December 19, 2016, 10:21:20 AM
Quote from: covufan on December 19, 2016, 09:52:40 AM
I would like to think that this was more of a scheduling problem this year and not a snub to IPFW.  I think that Valpo is trying to create basketball relationships with other schools in nearby region (Ball St, Indiana St this year), and that IPFW will be on the schedule in future years.  IPFW is a good basketball program and an away game at IPFW takes the team away from studies much less than other trips.  It is a good fit for both teams and should be pursued in the future.
In his defense he did mention a desire to schedule other schools in the state.  Of course he failed to mention a Butler snub.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: Valpo89 on December 19, 2016, 10:42:52 AM
Regarding Santa Clara, I sat by a couple ladies who said one reason they scheduled the game is because Santa Clara has a 'local' kid on the team - maybe from Aurora? I haven't looked at the roster yet, but they were excited for the game. I believe a neighbor in Valpo is a grandmother or something. So that's a home game for Valpo while NOT having to make a trip to Fort Wayne so Tom Davis could blast the Crusaders for something else. He's got a nice, long history of doing that.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: valpo64 on December 19, 2016, 10:55:53 AM
I think Tom Davis spends most of his time looking in a mirror and loving what he sees.  For being an editor of a mid- sized Indiana newspaper, he lets his predudices  get in his way way too often when he reports.  I wonder when the last time was when he talked to anyone from Valpo about anything.  Let IPFW, or Fort Wayne or whatever they are called schedule their Stetsons, Spring Arbors, etc. While the IU thing was a once in a lifetime thing, good for them.  But TD's reporting of Butler and lack of saying anything about Valpo speaks for itself.  And now we can add IPFW, or Fort Wayne, to his list of preferencial, one-sided reporting.  He has no use for VU and that will never change.  As far as Indiana basketball is concerned, the Bulldog is "King of the Beasts".  I wonder if he even knows where Valparaiso is located in the State.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 12:59:17 PM
Quote from: wh on December 18, 2016, 10:34:19 PM
Fort Wayne wins again, but is that a good thing?
(By Tom Davis of The News-Sentinel)
Mastodons having trouble finding games due to growing success
Sunday, December 18, 2016 8:12 PM.

From the article:

"The coaches understand the quality of our basketball," Coffman said. "But I'm not sure that their fan bases do. Even with the top mid-majors in the Midwest, they're not psyched to play us because they know it is a quality game, if they care about their RPI it is good for their RPI, but their fan base doesn't necessarily recognize that."
Take Valparaiso for example.
The Crusaders are a dominant mid-major program (9-2 this season) with a potential NBA Draft pick (senior forward Alec Peters). In 12 of the past 13 seasons, Fort Wayne and Valpo have played each other, however, when Coffman called to schedule a game this season he got a familiar answer (from most programs), but a surprising one from Valpo.
"They had Alec Peters back," Coffman said, "they knew that they were going to be good this year, we've played that game (12 of the past 13 years), and they wouldn't play us this year."


I'd be more impressed if Coffman or Davis actually gave us the reason Valpo gave for not playing them.

There is always a reason I will find perfectly valid for refusing to play someone (but one you rarely hear these days): "In order to play you, we'd have to bump someone else who is better than you are."  (This ignores an even better reason, of course: "We'd have to buy out someone we're already contractually obligated to play.")

There is of course 1 team that fits the bill: D II Trinity Christian.  So, I think IPFW has a case.  Southern Utah and Coppin State do not fit the bill since they were part of the MGM Grand event.  Anybody else on our schedule could arguably be said to be as good or better than IPFW before the season started, but -- and I say this without knowing the details of scheduling Trinity Christian -- we could have played IPFW instead of them.

Logistically, Valpo may have a case that they couldn't make that swap if it was going to be at IPFW, so who knows ("If we're going to have to play a game on consecutive days it better be a home game and a game where we can reasonably expect to rest our regulars some..." <giggle in hindsight>).

But instead, all we got was, "they refused to play us."  Poorly written.  You set us up with "a reason" and then didn't give it to us.  Sort of like Chekov's maxim about the gun on the wall.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: agibson on December 19, 2016, 01:06:54 PM
Quote from: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 12:59:17 PMSort of like Chekov's maxim about the gun on the wall.

Color me educated. I'll have to reflect on that one.

Pragmatically, that maxim would have at least helped me on an American Lit quiz once upon a time. What color was that handkerchief, anyway? Was it in Young Goodman Brown?
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: talksalot on December 19, 2016, 01:13:41 PM
Quote from: Valpo89 on December 19, 2016, 10:42:52 AMI sat by a couple ladies who said one reason they scheduled the game is because Santa Clara has a 'local' kid on the team - maybe from Aurora?


The Bronco STUD scorer...

23   Jared Brownridge   G   6-3   200   Sr   Aurora, Ill. / Waubonsie Valley
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 01:18:13 PM
Quote from: agibson on December 19, 2016, 01:06:54 PM
Quote from: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 12:59:17 PMSort of like Chekov's maxim about the gun on the wall.

Color me educated. I'll have to reflect on that one.

Pragmatically, that maxim would have at least helped me on an American Lit quiz once upon a time. What color was that handkerchief, anyway? Was it in Young Goodman Brown?
The best I can infer is that Coffman and/or Davis know the reason but don't wish to spell it out publicly, which allows them to imply something nefarious without actually saying so.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: justducky on December 19, 2016, 03:07:03 PM
Quote from: covufan on December 19, 2016, 09:52:40 AMI would like to think that this was more of a scheduling problem this year and not a snub to IPFW.
I would love to believe this but some of our past discussions about Ft. Wayne not being on our schedule suggest there may be more to the story. Some details about our long term schedule planning process could be helpful for us and for the Ft. Wayne press. A school that close and that competitive deserves the truth. Hopefully a good explanation will not force me to side with Tom Davis.



Quote from: valpo64 on December 19, 2016, 10:55:53 AMI think Tom Davis spends most of his time looking in a mirror and loving what he sees.  For being an editor of a mid- sized Indiana newspaper, he lets his predudices  get in his way way too often when he reports.  I wonder when the last time was when he talked to anyone from Valpo about anything.  Let IPFW, or Fort Wayne or whatever they are called schedule their Stetsons, Spring Arbors, etc. While the IU thing was a once in a lifetime thing, good for them.  But TD's reporting of Butler and lack of saying anything about Valpo speaks for itself.  And now we can add IPFW, or Fort Wayne, to his list of preferencial, one-sided reporting.  He has no use for VU and that will never change.

Lets remove IPFW from this conversation. They are not the bad guy and Davis is not their regular champion. Isn't this more of a rationalization of Butler practices? If your school (Butler) behaves with arrogant indifference then it is comforting to believe that this might be a common practice at every level of competition.

Quote from: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 12:59:17 PMSort of like Chekov's maxim about the gun on the wall.
I have no idea what this maxim is about but everything else that StLVUFan said is exactly what I was thinking. Sometimes I think I am his evil twin.  :o
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: FWalum on December 19, 2016, 03:35:22 PM
My comment on the News-Sentinel web site:

QuoteI understand why Tom picked Valpo to highlight in this article, at least they have actually been a consistent opponent on the Fort Wayne schedule since FW became a D1 program. He should have done a little more digging like I did when asked by the Fort Wayne athletic department to talk to Mark LaBarbera (VU's AD) about why VU would not schedule FW this year. The simple reason is that VU was involved in a tournament in Las Vegas that allowed them to play (and beat) Alabama and BYU in conjunction with a West coast trip to play Oregon, all of which was happening during the OOC time during which VU normally played FW. Just like FW, Valpo rarely gets to play major conference teams on a neutral floor and they had to take advantage of that opportunity. Perhaps Tom should talk to his Butler contacts to find out why the Bulldogs stopped playing FW as soon as Dane Fife became the head coach, or why Butler quit playing Valpo after the 2011-2012 season, despite their long history of playing 103 times since 1936. In Tom's defense, this is the game within the game that the power conferences play knowing that they will never play Mid-Major teams on that team's home-court in order to maintain the illusion that they are sooooo much better and deserve the lofty rankings along with the majority of spots and higher seedings in NCAA tournament.

To answer Serious Cubs Fan's question about Tom's axe to grind against Valpo, besides being a Butler alum and ardent fan, as he should be, all I know is that Tom got into a tiff last season with VU TV announcer Todd Ickow that was not very pretty. Maybe Tom ought to realize that there are probably a lot more Valpo Alums in Fort Wayne than Butler Alums and then maybe he would actually talk to the Valpo SID and get some accurate information.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: zvillehaze on December 19, 2016, 03:42:21 PM
Quote from: wh on December 18, 2016, 10:34:19 PM
Fort Wayne wins again, but is that a good thing?
(By Tom Davis of The News-Sentinel)
Mastodons having trouble finding games due to growing success
Sunday, December 18, 2016 8:12 PM.

From the article:

"The coaches understand the quality of our basketball," Coffman said. "But I'm not sure that their fan bases do. Even with the top mid-majors in the Midwest, they're not psyched to play us because they know it is a quality game, if they care about their RPI it is good for their RPI, but their fan base doesn't necessarily recognize that."
Take Valparaiso for example.
The Crusaders are a dominant mid-major program (9-2 this season) with a potential NBA Draft pick (senior forward Alec Peters). In 12 of the past 13 seasons, Fort Wayne and Valpo have played each other, however, when Coffman called to schedule a game this season he got a familiar answer (from most programs), but a surprising one from Valpo.
"They had Alec Peters back," Coffman said, "they knew that they were going to be good this year, we've played that game (12 of the past 13 years), and they wouldn't play us this year."

I assume Coffman was trying to point out the challenges they (and other mid-majors) have in scheduling quality games, but I don't agree with him calling out Valpo as someone who wouldn't play them.  As pointed out by others, there are many reasons that Valpo may not have wanted this game.  Maybe they needed more home games?  Maybe they couldn't find a date that worked?  Maybe they felt their schedule was already challenging enough?  Ultimately, Valpo doesn't owe them anything more than a "thanks, but no thanks".

I appreciate his frustration, but think he crossed the line in naming names.  A big part of scheduling is developing and leveraging relationships ... I doubt he helped his odds of playing Valpo in future years with that comment.


Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: bigmosmithfan1 on December 19, 2016, 03:51:55 PM
I've heard that VU had difficulty getting the Ball State game scheduled this year (nothing out of the ordinary, sometimes matching up dates can be trickier than most fans realize). And that was a contracted home game, so I wouldn't be surprised if a potential roadie not under contract at FW was pushed off to a future year while Valpo tried to load up its OOC schedule with the Vegas tourney and games at Kentucky and Oregon instead.

Davis often seems to be angling for the Butler SID job, so I'm not surprised he'd throw shade Valpo's way. When Butler joined the Big East, they immediately and unilaterally dropped their non-conference home-and-home series with Ball State (the two teams had played annually dating back to the 1930s, including many years in the late 80s through the mid 90s where Butler was an RPI drag on Ball State rather than the other way around). Not terribly unusual for a team to big-time an old rival like that, but Davis managed to float a column blaming *Ball State* for the series being dropped (even though Butler even admitted publicly it was their decision to end the series), for not proactively offering Butler more home games or a gilded throne or something. Take his statewide college hoops musings with massive grains of salt given his rabid BU fandom.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: a3uge on December 19, 2016, 03:55:48 PM
It's funny, he could have made Valpo look bad by actually getting a no-comment statement from them. He's even bad at hack-journalism.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: justducky on December 19, 2016, 04:38:23 PM
Quote from: zvillehaze on December 19, 2016, 03:42:21 PMUltimately, Valpo doesn't owe them anything more than a "thanks, but no thanks".
But we do owe them more and we are all hoping that an honest and adequate explanation was provided. Perhaps Coffman didn't hear the full story or has abbreviated it for some Tom Davis soundbites. As always I would rather believe the best until I know the worst and as I implied in an earlier post maybe there is a little fire under this smoke but probably not much.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 07:42:29 PM
Quote from: justducky on December 19, 2016, 03:07:03 PM
Quote from: covufan on December 19, 2016, 09:52:40 AMI would like to think that this was more of a scheduling problem this year and not a snub to IPFW.
I would love to believe this but some of our past discussions about Ft. Wayne not being on our schedule suggest there may be more to the story. Some details about our long term schedule planning process could be helpful for us and for the Ft. Wayne press. A school that close and that competitive deserves the truth. Hopefully a good explanation will not force me to side with Tom Davis.



Quote from: valpo64 on December 19, 2016, 10:55:53 AMI think Tom Davis spends most of his time looking in a mirror and loving what he sees.  For being an editor of a mid- sized Indiana newspaper, he lets his predudices  get in his way way too often when he reports.  I wonder when the last time was when he talked to anyone from Valpo about anything.  Let IPFW, or Fort Wayne or whatever they are called schedule their Stetsons, Spring Arbors, etc. While the IU thing was a once in a lifetime thing, good for them.  But TD's reporting of Butler and lack of saying anything about Valpo speaks for itself.  And now we can add IPFW, or Fort Wayne, to his list of preferencial, one-sided reporting.  He has no use for VU and that will never change.

Lets remove IPFW from this conversation. They are not the bad guy and Davis is not their regular champion. Isn't this more of a rationalization of Butler practices? If your school (Butler) behaves with arrogant indifference then it is comforting to believe that this might be a common practice at every level of competition.

Quote from: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 12:59:17 PMSort of like Chekov's maxim about the gun on the wall.
I have no idea what this maxim is about but everything else that StLVUFan said is exactly what I was thinking. Sometimes I think I am his evil twin.  :o
Quote from: justducky on December 19, 2016, 03:07:03 PMQuote from: StlVUFan on Today at 12:59:17 PM

    Sort of like Chekov's maxim about the gun on the wall.

I have no idea what this maxim is about but everything else that StLVUFan said is exactly what I was thinking. Sometimes I think I am his evil twin.  :o

Google is your friend, but ...

I'm not an authority, but I've heard it often enough from people who should be, so here goes my cheap-seat understanding:

Anton (I think?) Chekov, a famous writer/playwright/etc., asserted that in any good story, "if you see a gun on the wall in Act 1, it had better be fired by Act 3".  In other words, don't put something prominent in your story and then never pay it off.  The gun in this example is featured so that the reader/audience can't possibly miss it and immediately begins to anticipate it will be used.  The writer who teases his audience like that and then does nothing with it is a moron according to Chekov.

Davis' "gun on the wall" was "when Coffman called to schedule a game this season he got a familiar answer".  He never gave what that "answer" was ("answer" in this case, means "Valpo said they wouldn't play us, because ...", not Coffman saying, "they wouldn't play us").

My guess of course is that Davis didn't get the answer because Coffman didn't give it to him.  So he shouldn't have intimated an answer he wasn't prepared to reveal.  Per Chekov, if you're not going to fire the gun, don't put it on the wall in the first place.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 07:44:01 PM
Quote from: justducky on December 19, 2016, 04:38:23 PM
Quote from: zvillehaze on December 19, 2016, 03:42:21 PMUltimately, Valpo doesn't owe them anything more than a "thanks, but no thanks".
But we do owe them more and we are all hoping that an honest and adequate explanation was provided. Perhaps Coffman didn't hear the full story or has abbreviated it for some Tom Davis soundbites. As always I would rather believe the best until I know the worst and as I implied in an earlier post maybe there is a little fire under this smoke but probably not much.

And of course, neither Valpo nor IPFW owes *us* anything, right pgmado (I'm agreeing with Paul, not being sarcastic)?
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: justducky on December 19, 2016, 08:48:44 PM
Quote from: StlVUFan on December 19, 2016, 07:44:01 PMAnd of course, neither Valpo nor IPFW owes *us* anything,
Of course, just as we do not owe Valpo our unquestioned, unwavering allegiance.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: atkins on December 19, 2016, 11:37:35 PM
At least IPFW was able to convince the then third-ranked Hoosiers to play at home -- the first time in 49 years.  The Mastodons' win was not a fluke.  IU actually played a good game, but IPFW was simply better that night. 

There is a minimal chance that we would eek out a win against IU on their floor or ours because we would not match up well against them, so hats off to IPFW.

Makes me appreciate URI even more for having the courage to show up in Valpo.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: a3uge on December 20, 2016, 06:24:15 AM


Quote from: atkins on December 19, 2016, 11:37:35 PM
There is a minimal chance that we would eek out a win against IU on their floor or ours because we would not match up well against them, so hats off to IPFW.


It's interesting how Valpo always does poorly in your theoretical games.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: Valpo89 on December 20, 2016, 08:37:39 AM
Quote from: FWalum on December 19, 2016, 03:35:22 PM
My comment on the News-Sentinel web site:

QuoteI understand why Tom picked Valpo to highlight in this article, at least they have actually been a consistent opponent on the Fort Wayne schedule since FW became a D1 program. He should have done a little more digging like I did when asked by the Fort Wayne athletic department to talk to Mark LaBarbera (VU's AD) about why VU would not schedule FW this year. The simple reason is that VU was involved in a tournament in Las Vegas that allowed them to play (and beat) Alabama and BYU in conjunction with a West coast trip to play Oregon, all of which was happening during the OOC time during which VU normally played FW. Just like FW, Valpo rarely gets to play major conference teams on a neutral floor and they had to take advantage of that opportunity. Perhaps Tom should talk to his Butler contacts to find out why the Bulldogs stopped playing FW as soon as Dane Fife became the head coach, or why Butler quit playing Valpo after the 2011-2012 season, despite their long history of playing 103 times since 1936. In Tom's defense, this is the game within the game that the power conferences play knowing that they will never play Mid-Major teams on that team's home-court in order to maintain the illusion that they are sooooo much better and deserve the lofty rankings along with the majority of spots and higher seedings in NCAA tournament.

To answer Serious Cubs Fan's question about Tom's axe to grind against Valpo, besides being a Butler alum and ardent fan, as he should be, all I know is that Tom got into a tiff last season with VU TV announcer Todd Ickow that was not very pretty. Maybe Tom ought to realize that there are probably a lot more Valpo Alums in Fort Wayne than Butler Alums and then maybe he would actually talk to the Valpo SID and get some accurate information.


This is awesome. Did Davis respond?
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: covufan on December 20, 2016, 11:39:38 AM
Quote from: Valpo89 on December 20, 2016, 08:37:39 AM
Quote from: FWalum on December 19, 2016, 03:35:22 PM
My comment on the News-Sentinel web site:

QuoteI understand why Tom picked Valpo to highlight in this article, at least they have actually been a consistent opponent on the Fort Wayne schedule since FW became a D1 program. He should have done a little more digging like I did when asked by the Fort Wayne athletic department to talk to Mark LaBarbera (VU's AD) about why VU would not schedule FW this year. The simple reason is that VU was involved in a tournament in Las Vegas that allowed them to play (and beat) Alabama and BYU in conjunction with a West coast trip to play Oregon, all of which was happening during the OOC time during which VU normally played FW. Just like FW, Valpo rarely gets to play major conference teams on a neutral floor and they had to take advantage of that opportunity. Perhaps Tom should talk to his Butler contacts to find out why the Bulldogs stopped playing FW as soon as Dane Fife became the head coach, or why Butler quit playing Valpo after the 2011-2012 season, despite their long history of playing 103 times since 1936. In Tom's defense, this is the game within the game that the power conferences play knowing that they will never play Mid-Major teams on that team's home-court in order to maintain the illusion that they are sooooo much better and deserve the lofty rankings along with the majority of spots and higher seedings in NCAA tournament.

To answer Serious Cubs Fan's question about Tom's axe to grind against Valpo, besides being a Butler alum and ardent fan, as he should be, all I know is that Tom got into a tiff last season with VU TV announcer Todd Ickow that was not very pretty. Maybe Tom ought to realize that there are probably a lot more Valpo Alums in Fort Wayne than Butler Alums and then maybe he would actually talk to the Valpo SID and get some accurate information.


This is awesome. Did Davis respond?

Not yet:

http://www.news-sentinel.com/sports/Fort-Wayne-wins-again--but-is-that-a-good-thing-


Here is Davis' retweet of News-Sentinel if someone would like to seek a response:

https://twitter.com/TheNSSports/status/810922792837386240
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: FWalum on December 20, 2016, 12:24:52 PM
Hopefully I will get a chance to talk to Coach Coffman tonight.  We host the IPFW coaches show every Tuesday night at the ACME Bar and Grill (https://www.facebook.com/AcmeBarAndGrill/) and my cousin and coaching partner is the color commentator for their TV broadcasts. I'll report back on any comment I can get from the coach.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: Pgmado on December 20, 2016, 01:41:05 PM
I break this all down on Twitter.

Games Valpo had to play this year
Home Return games: Ball State, Rhode Island, Indiana State, Chicago State
Road Return game: Missouri State

Vegas tournament games
Vegas: Alabama, BYU
Home Vegas games: Southern Utah, Coppin State

New Home and Home
Home: Santa Clara (will go there next year)

That leaves three slots on the schedule. Valpo wants home games in order to make money. Looking anywhere at 6-to-8 non-conference home games a year. On strength of NIT run, want as many home games as possible to bring in fans. Putting Trinity Christian on schedule when it was helps replicate Horizon League tournament of playing three games in four days. It's not a great game, but it's also a bit hypocritical of Valpo to not give the little guy a shot when it is constantly looking for shot against bigger programs.

That leaves two road games. Going out west for Vegas gives Valpo the impetus to reach out to Oregon again. Game gets scheduled and Valpo has a top RPI game against a preseason top five opponent.

Now we're down to one road game. Valpo has been trying to get Kentucky on the schedule for several years. Nearly had it locked in during 2014-15 season. Take blowout win against Maine off the schedule and put in blowout loss to Kentucky and Valpo's RPI still jumps high enough to land a No. 12 seed. Valpo has the chance to get another RPI boosting game at Kentucky. Of course Valpo will take that over Fort Wayne.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: VULB#62 on December 20, 2016, 02:03:06 PM
Quote from: Pgmado on December 20, 2016, 01:41:05 PM
I break this all down on Twitter.

Games Valpo had to play this year
Home Return games: Ball State, Rhode Island, Indiana State, Chicago State
Road Return game: Missouri State

Vegas tournament games
Vegas: Alabama, BYU
Home Vegas games: Southern Utah, Coppin State

New Home and Home
Home: Santa Clara (will go there next year)

That leaves three slots on the schedule. Valpo wants home games in order to make money. Looking anywhere at 6-to-8 non-conference home games a year. On strength of NIT run, want as many home games as possible to bring in fans. Putting Trinity Christian on schedule when it was helps replicate Horizon League tournament of playing three games in four days. It's not a great game, but it's also a bit hypocritical of Valpo to not give the little guy a shot when it is constantly looking for shot against bigger programs.

That leaves two road games. Going out west for Vegas gives Valpo the impetus to reach out to Oregon again. Game gets scheduled and Valpo has a top RPI game against a preseason top five opponent.

Now we're down to one road game. Valpo has been trying to get Kentucky on the schedule for several years. Nearly had it locked in during 2014-15 season. Take blowout win against Maine off the schedule and put in blowout loss to Kentucky and Valpo's RPI still jumps high enough to land a No. 12 seed. Valpo has the chance to get another RPI boosting game at Kentucky. Of course Valpo will take that over Fort Wayne.

this scenario doesn't mean "snub."  Snub, to me, means completely turning your back to a person, organization, event, etc.  I could definitely see Matt saying "we can't play you this year (see above), but let's work on a visit next year."  But that either got left out of the article or was spun to add a bit sensationalism/controversy to the article.

The other thing I noted was that in the article the coach was quoted as "would not play us."  There is very little distance in terms of speech between 'would not' and 'could not' but there is a huge gap in perception.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: valpo64 on December 20, 2016, 02:44:12 PM
I believe that sometime earlier this season either ML or MLaB had stated that the reason we didn't play Ft.W this year was because of scheduling problems for us.  However I think one of our people also said they hoped it could be worked out for next year.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: M on December 20, 2016, 02:55:39 PM
Who cares...it is flattering that teams are upset they didn't get on our schedule.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: FWalum on December 20, 2016, 07:13:36 PM
Had a long talk with Coach Coffman tonight after his segment of the show on ESPN 1380 here in Fort Wayne.  John is a delight to talk to and his passion and enthusiasm for the game and his team is great for Fort Wayne.  Coach Coffman was very surprised when I told him that some Valpo people felt that he was calling us out for not playing them.  He was very disappointed that the two teams were unable to play and responded to Tom Davis when TD specifically asked him about whether he had tried to schedule a game with Valpo.  He said that he couldn't remember exactly how he worded his response to Tom and in fact had not even read the article.  He was surprised when I told him that a fair amount of the article was about Valpo's refusal to play a good FW team here at home.  We talked more about his Lutheran background, his mother's family being one of the 7 original founders of Frankenmuth (his grandfather's voice is the recorded voice you hear when visiting the Frankenmuth Museum), and his friendship with Bryce.

Scheduling problems are a real issue for all mid-majors and more so if you are perceived to be a threat. Games they had gotten in the past to play at Michigan and Illinois where not to be had this year. He caught a lot flak for not getting VU on the schedule, but he told me that he completely understood Valpo's situation, wanting to play some other teams coming off of the NIT run with a new coach. He really thinks that the two schools playing each other would be good for both schools and hopes that Valpo will want to play again in the very near future... at the Memorial Coliseum.

He also said that Tom Davis likes to be the antagonist and stirs the pot whenever he can citing the shellacking TD gave Fort Wayne after the Notre Dame loss. Butler coach Chris Holtmann called him and wanted to know what he had to do to get Davis off of his back after this article Holtmann handles Butler win superbly, just not the postgame (http://www.news-sentinel.com/sports/Holtmann-handles-Butler-win-superbly--just-not-the-postgame). I guess in the end all Tom wants to do is sell papers and website views. 

I keep telling TD and his reporters that he should be covering the Lutheran University in a Lutheran town, I just didn't expect it to be like this.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: valporun on December 20, 2016, 08:21:26 PM
Tom Davis sounds like the kind of reporter that is so flippant towards any suggestions of what to write about, and how to present it in words, that he just uses the suggestions as toilet paper, and write about what he wants how he wants whenever he wants.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: VULB#62 on December 20, 2016, 10:33:40 PM
Thanks FWalum for the very clear summary of how this REALLY went down. Unfortunately, the TDs in the media create controversy where there is none and contribute to the fake news we are being subjected to recently.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: a3uge on December 21, 2016, 06:03:13 AM
Wow, Coffman seems like a good dude too.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: oklahomamick on December 21, 2016, 07:00:35 AM
Wish we could snub Mercy this this year.  Their rip is 314! 
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: FWalum on December 21, 2016, 09:14:53 AM
Quote from: oklahomamick on December 21, 2016, 07:00:35 AM
Wish we could snub Mercy this this year.  Their rip is 314! 
It will be interesting to see what Fort Wayne does when they visit Detroit Mercy Thursday night.  Coach Coffman said there were some match up issues athletically with Detroit and felt they definitely were not as bad as their record indicated.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: oklahomamick on December 21, 2016, 09:46:33 AM
Quote from: FWalum on December 21, 2016, 09:14:53 AM
Quote from: oklahomamick on December 21, 2016, 07:00:35 AMWish we could snub Mercy this this year.  Their rip is 314!
It will be interesting to see what Fort Wayne does when they visit Detroit Mercy Thursday night.  Coach Coffman said there were some match up issues athletically with Detroit and felt they definitely were not as bad as their record indicated.

He said that because hes a good guy and knows the business.  Just giving respect.  It's coach talk.
Title: Re: We snubbed Ft. Wayne
Post by: valporun on December 21, 2016, 05:16:05 PM
I would give Detroit a little bit of a pass, post-MacCallum. The RPI will pick up for them in a year or two.