Per @ValpoBasketball twitter account we learned today that Rossi is good to go from the start of the season. Great news as we turn the corner into August.
WOW. That is great news and I'll update the eligibility chart accordingly.
http://www.valpofanzone.com/2012/05/02/tentative-eligibility-chart/ (http://www.valpofanzone.com/2012/05/02/tentative-eligibility-chart/)
BTW, NCAA, this only means I detest you slightly less.
Excellent news!! I want to say welcome to Crusader basketball Alex Rossi!!
this info as it was announced on twitter....
Valpo Basketball‏@ValpoBasketball
We learned today that Alex Rossi will be eligible to play immediately next season! Look forward to seeing him on #ValpoGameday next year!
Man this is excellent! We are finally greasing the right palms at the NCAA clearing house!
Although: is it wrong that I had almost started hoping that maybe he'd have to wait a year?
Hear me out: at the 2 and 3 we already have Bogan, Boggs, Broekhoff (though of course he can and does also play 4), Coleman, Dority (though of course he is more likely to spend time at 1), Kenney and Kurth.
That's 7 (now eight) bodies for 4 (or 5) roles (2 starters, 2 or 3 subs).
Obviously, if he's good enough to supplant any of them, that's good. But if he's not better by a significant (i.e. measurable) amount, then maybe we could have saved that extra year? Put another way, would you rather have 2010-11 Ryan Broekhoff or 2012-13 Ryan Broekhoff?
Thus, what it boils down to, all questions of his understandably wanting to graduate and be on with his life aside of course, as that's another (non-basketball) consideration, is this:
Is Alex Rossi more valuable to an already-loaded team this year than he would be as a 24-year-old super senior in 2015-16 (where he would have been the only senior in that class currently)?
Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on July 31, 2012, 04:33:30 PM
Although: is it wrong that I had almost started hoping that maybe he'd have to wait a year?
Hear me out: at the 2 and 3 we already have Bogan, Boggs, Broekhoff (though of course he can and does also play 4), Coleman, Dority (though of course he is more likely to spend time at 1), Kenney and Kurth.
That's 7 (now eight) bodies for 4 (or 5) roles (2 starters, 2 or 3 subs).
Obviously, if he's good enough to supplant any of them, that's good. But if he's not better by a significant (i.e. measurable) amount, then maybe we could have saved that extra year? Put another way, would you rather have 2010-11 Ryan Broekhoff or 2012-13 Ryan Broekhoff?
Thus, what it boils down to, all questions of his understandably wanting to graduate and be on with his life aside of course, as that's another (non-basketball) consideration, is this:
Is Alex Rossi more valuable to an already-loaded team this year than he would be as a 24-year-old super senior in 2015-16 (where he would have been the only senior in that class currently)?
I believe he's already used two of his five years at Cal (redshirting one of them), so he only would have three years total here regardless of whether he'd be able to play all three or have to sit this year.
That is true, but since the first redshirt was for injury, it's quite possible he could get another (a la Greg Tonagel on the six-year-plan).
Or think Scott Martin, who had an injury redshirt at ND as well as a transfer year sit out.
The non-con schedule starts tilting more in Valpo's favor...
Good deal. :thumbsup: It'll be interesting to see what kind of rotations Bryce decides to use with the deep bench this season.
Two returning 1st team all-conf. players, the reigning conf. MVP, last year's entire starting 5, 5 BCS transfers --- good heavens!
I am new to this forum, but have been following Valpo and the Horizon League for the past couple years
With the addition of Rossi for 2012-13, here is how I see the depth chart
4 and 5: Kevin Van Wijk, Ryan Broekhoff, Bobby Capobianco, Vashil Fernandez
I see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.
2 and 3: Alex Rossi, Matt Kenney, Ben Boggs, Will Bogan, Jordan Coleman
Defensively, I do not know how ready Rossi is to play huge minutes, considering he has barely played college basketball. I see Kenney and Bogan starting, with Jordan Coleman being the odd man out in this rotation. I am not going to give minute projections because too much could happen. Ben Boggs needs to prove that he can be a good shooter (29% is not gonna get it done) or his minutes could slip to Rossi.
1: Erik Buggs, Lavonte Dority, Tommy Kurth
If Dority is not eligible until mid-December, Kurth might have to play about 10 mpg at point guard for the first six weeks of the season. Or, Matt Kenney could play point guard for a few minutes as he averaged 2.5 apg last year. Once Dority is eligible, he will probably play maybe 18-19 minutes at PG while Buggs plays about 21.
This is a very deep team, and they'll still be fine depth-wise even with 1-2 injuries on the perimeter. If healthy, there is no reason this team shouldn't win the HL, especially if Rossi is playing well. Having three great 3-point shooters on the floor potentially (Bogan, Broekhoff, Rossi) could make up somewhat for Buggs' non-existent jump shot, and could give him more driving lanes. Go Valpo!!!!!
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 10:36:46 AM
I am new to this forum, but have been following Valpo and the Horizon League for the past couple years
With the addition of Rossi for 2012-13, here is how I see the depth chart
4 and 5: Kevin Van Wijk, Ryan Broekhoff, Bobby Capobianco, Vashil Fernandez
I see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.
2 and 3: Alex Rossi, Matt Kenney, Ben Boggs, Will Bogan, Jordan Coleman
Defensively, I do not know how ready Rossi is to play huge minutes, considering he has barely played college basketball. I see Kenney and Bogan starting, with Jordan Coleman being the odd man out in this rotation. I am not going to give minute projections because too much could happen. Ben Boggs needs to prove that he can be a good shooter (29% is not gonna get it done) or his minutes could slip to Rossi.
1: Erik Buggs, Lavonte Dority, Tommy Kurth
If Dority is not eligible until mid-December, Kurth might have to play about 10 mpg at point guard for the first six weeks of the season. Or, Matt Kenney could play point guard for a few minutes as he averaged 2.5 apg last year. Once Dority is eligible, he will probably play maybe 18-19 minutes at PG while Buggs plays about 21.
This is a very deep team, and they'll still be fine depth-wise even with 1-2 injuries on the perimeter. If healthy, there is no reason this team shouldn't win the HL, especially if Rossi is playing well. Having three great 3-point shooters on the floor potentially (Bogan, Broekhoff, Rossi) could make up somewhat for Buggs' non-existent jump shot, and could give him more driving lanes. Go Valpo!!!!!
:welcome: A good analysis and sure good to be talking basketball again versus the death penalty! I do think we will see Ryan some at the 3 as you could easily see Bobby, Kevin and Ryan on the floor all at the same time. The question is whether or not Ryan can cover a 3 as in the Horizon they are more likely 6'3 or 4 so naturally quicker. The opposite is true as well as he, being 6'7" will be a matchup problem too. Rossi is a natural 3 and at 6'5 or 6 is said to be a very good defender in addition to a lights out shooter. He has had plenty of time to recover but only time will tell...
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 10:36:46 AMI see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.
I would have to politely disagree. I think that Ryan will be in the rotation at both the 4 and the 3. There most certainly will be times when Kevin, Bobby and Ryan are on the floor at the same time and unless Capobianco is going to play the 3 on a regular basis, then Ryan will have to fill that role in that particular rotation. Your comparison to Cory's situation is not really valid as we literally had no one else physically capable and competent to play the 5. Kevin could only be counted on for short periods to give Cory a breather. If Kevin had been in the same physical condition Cory's senior year as he was last year I have no doubt that we would have seen some rotations with Cory at the 4.
With the departures of Vucic and Edwards, this team is not that deep in the frontcourt. Therefore, I can't see a Bobby-Kevin-Ryan lineup for more than a few minutes per game. I also don't know how much Vashil is going to play, but I don't think it will be more than 10 mpg. There are too many guards who played a lot of minutes last season, if Broekhoff plays the 3, then some of the guards (boggs, kenney, bogan, etc.) could see their playing time drop too much.
I don't think Ryan would have trouble guarding the 3 spot, especially since some teams could possibly go big at the 3 to guard Ryan, (such as Ryan Haggerty or Armond Battle).
Quote from: FWalum on August 01, 2012, 11:54:59 AMQuote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 10:36:46 AMI see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.
I would have to politely disagree. I think that Ryan will be in the rotation at both the 4 and the 3. There most certainly will be times when Kevin, Bobby and Ryan are on the floor at the same time and unless Capobianco is going to play the 3 on a regular basis, then Ryan will have to fill that role in that particular rotation. Your comparison to Cory's situation is not really valid as we literally had no one else physically capable and competent to play the 5. Kevin could only be counted on for short periods to give Cory a breather. If Kevin had been in the same physical condition Cory's senior year as he was last year I have no doubt that we would have seen some rotations with Cory at the 4.
There is no reason that the 2010-11 team couldn't have had Van Wijk, Cam Witt, and Vucic play a majority of the minutes at center. Would that have been good for the team? Maybe not (although it would've been good for Cory individually), but it could have been done, even if it was Van Wijk 20, Witt and Vucic 10 each.
Sorry for getting off-topic with the "Cory Johnson not at the four spot" talk
Back to Rossi, If he can be a 40% 3 point shooter, it will make up for the poor shooting of Buggs, Boggs, and sometimes Kenney. Shooting will be how he helps the team this year, and he will definitely help the offensively if nothing else
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 12:24:28 PM
Quote from: FWalum on August 01, 2012, 11:54:59 AMQuote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 10:36:46 AMI see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.
I would have to politely disagree. I think that Ryan will be in the rotation at both the 4 and the 3. There most certainly will be times when Kevin, Bobby and Ryan are on the floor at the same time and unless Capobianco is going to play the 3 on a regular basis, then Ryan will have to fill that role in that particular rotation. Your comparison to Cory's situation is not really valid as we literally had no one else physically capable and competent to play the 5. Kevin could only be counted on for short periods to give Cory a breather. If Kevin had been in the same physical condition Cory's senior year as he was last year I have no doubt that we would have seen some rotations with Cory at the 4.
There is no reason that the 2010-11 team couldn't have had Van Wijk, Cam Witt, and Vucic play a majority of the minutes at center. Would that have been good for the team? Maybe not (although it would've been good for Cory individually), but it could have been done, even if it was Van Wijk 20, Witt and Vucic 10 each.
Now you're getting into it! 2 years ago Kevin was in constant pain and couldn't go longer minutes. Vucic? Really? He was never going to be a D1 player. Cam could have played some, but would have been a drastic dropoff from Cory. In an earlier post you said that we wouldn't be very deep up front with the loss of Richie and Vucic. Same story: Vucic isn't a loss and Richie was more comfortable on the perimeter--not a banger at all. Now we bring in a true banger and a real shot blocker. That's a 2 for 1 so we actually are deeper than last year and, we add some size in Rossi as well.
Quote from: vu72 on August 01, 2012, 01:09:52 PMQuote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 12:24:28 PMQuote from: FWalum on August 01, 2012, 11:54:59 AMQuote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 10:36:46 AM[size=78%]I see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.[/size]
[size=78%] I would have to politely disagree. I think that Ryan will be in the rotation at both the 4 and the 3. There most certainly will be times when Kevin, Bobby and Ryan are on the floor at the same time and unless Capobianco is going to play the 3 on a regular basis, then Ryan will have to fill that role in that particular rotation. Your comparison to Cory's situation is not really valid as we literally had no one else physically capable and competent to play the 5. Kevin could only be counted on for short periods to give Cory a breather. If Kevin had been in the same physical condition Cory's senior year as he was last year I have no doubt that we would have seen some rotations with Cory at the 4. [/size]
[size=78%] There is no reason that the 2010-11 team couldn't have had Van Wijk, Cam Witt, and Vucic play a majority of the minutes at center. Would that have been good for the team? Maybe not (although it would've been good for Cory individually), but it could have been done, even if it was Van Wijk 20, Witt and Vucic 10 each. [/size]
[size=78%] Now you're getting into it! 2 years ago Kevin was in constant pain and couldn't go longer minutes. Vucic? Really? He was never going to be a D1 player. Cam could have played some, but would have been a drastic dropoff from Cory. In an earlier post you said that we wouldn't be very deep up front with the loss of Richie and Vucic. Same story: Vucic isn't a loss and Richie was more comfortable on the perimeter--not a banger at all. Now we bring in a true banger and a real shot blocker. That's a 2 for 1 so we actually are deeper than last year and, we add some size in Rossi as well. [/size]
I guess I have a higher opinion of Cam and Vucic than you do. They both showed some ability to make a 15 foot jump shot, something Kevin hasn't done. See Cam in the game at Cleveland State in his junior year. Also, I wouldn't go as far as saying that Vucic couldn't have been a serviceable 10-15 minute guy by NEXT season. He would've needed to get stronger, and maybe developed a post move or two. I am not sad that he is gone, but with two more years, I think he could have at least become a decent backup post player to Bobby and Vashil.
Don't forget that Cam had 7 double figure scoring games as a freshman, but was never given the playing time or touches to score that much from that point on.
Going on with International big men, is Vashil ready to make an impact already. He seems like a guy who will take a couple of years to develop an offensive game. With Kevin, Bobby, and Ryan, I don't think he will make too big of a splash this season.
While I do think Capo is a major upgrade from Richie, I still think Richie is a better 3-point shooter. Bobby was 5/19 on threes in his two years at Indiana. With the addition of Rossi, I don't know how many threes Valpo will need him to take. I still believe that Bobby is going to make an even bigger impact next year, I am not going to pencil him in for 10 ppg this year.
PS. Also interested to see how Richie does at ASU, against higher level competition
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 12:24:28 PM
Quote from: FWalum on August 01, 2012, 11:54:59 AMQuote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 10:36:46 AMI see Bobby and Kevin each playing about 20 mpg, Ryan 31 mpg, and Vashil Fernandez 9 mpg. I know we would all love to see Ryan at the 3, but that is not likely to happen. It would have been great if Cory Johnson could've played the 4 but that didn't happen either.
I would have to politely disagree. I think that Ryan will be in the rotation at both the 4 and the 3. There most certainly will be times when Kevin, Bobby and Ryan are on the floor at the same time and unless Capobianco is going to play the 3 on a regular basis, then Ryan will have to fill that role in that particular rotation. Your comparison to Cory's situation is not really valid as we literally had no one else physically capable and competent to play the 5. Kevin could only be counted on for short periods to give Cory a breather. If Kevin had been in the same physical condition Cory's senior year as he was last year I have no doubt that we would have seen some rotations with Cory at the 4.
There is no reason that the 2010-11 team couldn't have had Van Wijk, Cam Witt, and Vucic play a majority of the minutes at center. Would that have been good for the team? Maybe not (although it would've been good for Cory individually), but it could have been done, even if it was Van Wijk 20, Witt and Vucic 10 each.
So I would have to concluded that your starting lineup has Capobianco sitting on the bench and being used primarily as a sub for Kevin. I am sorry but I don't see that happening. We will make the adjustment to move Ryan over when needed and other guys will have to fill in for short stretches. It has been a very long time since we have had a 4 and 5 of this caliber and I don't think we will waste the opportunity.
Your assertion that VanWijk, Witt and Vucic could have played the majority of minutes at center is of course possible, almost anything is possible, but the probability was almost nil. Kevin could not play more than 4 or 5 minutes at a stretch with out back spasms and pain, Witt had his own injury problems which made him unavailable for a number of games and Vucic was no where near being competent enough to play his sophomore year. To put any of these players during that year at the same level as Capobianco is just not thinkable. If Kevin had been capable of playing in 2010-2011 at the level he played last year don't you think we would have seen Kevin and Cory on the floor at the same time a significant number of minutes? I do, and we would have been better for it.
With the addition of Rossi for this season, how many minutes per game do you think a Broekhoff, Van Wijk, Capobianco lineup will be used?
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 02:46:27 PMWith the addition of Rossi for this season, how many minutes per game do you think a Broekhoff, Van Wijk, Capobianco lineup will be used?
Against certain opponents it could go as high as 14,but the average for the season will probably be more like 7 or 8. Of course we have to to assume that Rossi will be fully recovered , and that might not be the case.
What is the latest health status on Rossi? How ready will he be come November?
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 03:53:28 PM
What is the latest health status on Rossi? How ready will he be come November?
I don't anything about it but this article, dated March of 2011, say he is coming along great and expected to be at full strength by summer, 2011.
http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2011/03/04/basketball-20-questions-with-alex-rossi/ (http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2011/03/04/basketball-20-questions-with-alex-rossi/)
I've never seen Capobianco play, but if he is more like KVW it will be a change for Valpo to play offense with two post players. If that is the case, I would expect that a Broekhoff, KVW, Capobianco lineup will be rare - especially early in the season and against better opponents. If Capobianco is more mobile than KVW (not meant as a negative on KVW), then that lineup could be used more often (and could be very good).
Broekhoff is Valpo's best player and will get 30-35 minutes per game. He can play the 2, 3 or 4. KVW is the next best player and will get all of the minutes he can handle - assume 25-28 minutes per game. KVW really can only play the 5 in college unless the opponent has two low post players (rare in college). Rossi and Capobianco will get playing time around that. If Rossi is as good as people think he may be, he will either play a lot of 3 (with Broekhoff playing the 4) or will compete with the other 2's for playing time. Thus, Capobianco's flexibilty to play the 4 or 5 becomes the key since that would open up many different lineup possibilities due to the versatility of Broekhoff.
Quote from: vu84v2 on August 01, 2012, 04:14:18 PM
I've never seen Capobianco play, but if he is more like KVW it will be a change for Valpo to play offense with two post players. If that is the case, I would expect that a Broekhoff, KVW, Capobianco lineup will be rare - especially early in the season and against better opponents. If Capobianco is more mobile than KVW (not meant as a negative on KVW), then that lineup could be used more often (and could be very good).
Broekhoff is Valpo's best player and will get 30-35 minutes per game. He can play the 2, 3 or 4. KVW is the next best player and will get all of the minutes he can handle - assume 25-28 minutes per game. KVW really can only play the 5 in college unless the opponent has two low post players (rare in college). Rossi and Capobianco will get playing time around that. If Rossi is as good as people think he may be, he will either play a lot of 3 (with Broekhoff playing the 4) or will compete with the other 2's for playing time. Thus, Capobianco's flexibilty to play the 4 or 5 becomes the key since that would open up many different lineup possibilities due to the versatility of Broekhoff.
This is a short video I posted some time ago which shows Bobby doing several different things. It was made in 2008. I suspect, just a guess, that he may be a little stronger or improved on a few aspects to his game during the last four years. ;)
Commit of the Day: Bobby Capobianco (11/10/08) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKZkQ65otHs#)
Quote from: vu84v2 on August 01, 2012, 04:14:18 PMI've never seen Capobianco play, but if he is more like KVW it will be a change for Valpo to play offense with two post players. If that is the case, I would expect that a Broekhoff, KVW, Capobianco lineup will be rare - especially early in the season and against better opponents. If Capobianco is more mobile than KVW (not meant as a negative on KVW), then that lineup could be used more often (and could be very good). Broekhoff is Valpo's best player and will get 30-35 minutes per game. He can play the 2, 3 or 4. KVW is the next best player and will get all of the minutes he can handle - assume 25-28 minutes per game. KVW really can only play the 5 in college unless the opponent has two low post players (rare in college). Rossi and Capobianco will get playing time around that. If Rossi is as good as people think he may be, he will either play a lot of 3 (with Broekhoff playing the 4) or will compete with the other 2's for playing time. Thus, Capobianco's flexibilty to play the 4 or 5 becomes the key since that would open up many different lineup possibilities due to the versatility of Broekhoff.
How many minutes do you see guys like Kenney, Bogan, and Boggs getting?
Quote from: vubballfan10 on August 01, 2012, 04:59:47 PM
Quote from: vu84v2 on August 01, 2012, 04:14:18 PMI've never seen Capobianco play, but if he is more like KVW it will be a change for Valpo to play offense with two post players. If that is the case, I would expect that a Broekhoff, KVW, Capobianco lineup will be rare - especially early in the season and against better opponents. If Capobianco is more mobile than KVW (not meant as a negative on KVW), then that lineup could be used more often (and could be very good). Broekhoff is Valpo's best player and will get 30-35 minutes per game. He can play the 2, 3 or 4. KVW is the next best player and will get all of the minutes he can handle - assume 25-28 minutes per game. KVW really can only play the 5 in college unless the opponent has two low post players (rare in college). Rossi and Capobianco will get playing time around that. If Rossi is as good as people think he may be, he will either play a lot of 3 (with Broekhoff playing the 4) or will compete with the other 2's for playing time. Thus, Capobianco's flexibilty to play the 4 or 5 becomes the key since that would open up many different lineup possibilities due to the versatility of Broekhoff.
How many minutes do you see guys like Kenney, Bogan, and Boggs getting?
I posted this short video of Bobby a while ago but it does show some of the things he can do, and they include several things we've never seen Kevin do. Remember, this was made in 2008, so, presumably he has improved on some if not all of these skills. ;)
Commit of the Day: Bobby Capobianco (11/10/08) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKZkQ65otHs#)
If that video of Capobianco doesn't get your blood pumping, then you don't have a pulse! :thumbsup:
I don't expect our offense to change a whole lot really. It is focused around a lot of ball screens coming from Kevin, this year Bobby will add another body to set screens but what I think some people don't realize is how well he shoots the ball from deep. When he is on he could possibly be one of our best shooters. The lineup that Coach Drew decides to put on the floor at any given time will most likely depend on what time of game it is or whether he wants to change up the tempo to become bigger or faster. Either way there isn't a lineup that I don't like out there. Hopefully big things to come this season!
Getting Rossi immediately will sure help. Yes, Bryce will have his hands full with the rotation. Our teams, and a lot of college teams since the 3-pt line, are very G-SF centric - interchanging players between all of the positions. Sometimes it may also seem that we have four perimeter players on offense, with some zone and switching on defense. Maybe we can expect a more up-tempo game this year. If we can keep our G's and SF's fresh, we might be able to take advantage of those situations.
Rowdy can, and I'm sure at times will, play the three. Guarding the opposing three man won't be that big of an issue. Valpo played a lot of zone last year and played it very well. As far as the starting lineup, I would imagine it will be the same one we saw last year. I think Buggs will have a career year and Boggs can only play better then he did last year.
I would be surprised is Capo doesn't start. That means probably Boggs comes off the bench. Not the big a deal because of the Bryce/Homer method of bringing in new guys early in the first half. I really don't think Fernandez will be an automatic supstitution wise but think we will see a lot of Boggs, Rossi and Coleman. Nice poblems to have.
I was not overly impressed by the Capobianco video. He'll be good but not great. When you're a big boy, you've got to like banging! ha ha ha :)
The video is 4 years old. It's the same as looking at a Ryan Broekhoff high school video and using it to speculate what Ryan's role will be this coming season.
There is certainly considerable talent on board for this coming year...or at least players that didnt play at the BCS level of schools. The team chemistry should be there, but with an influx of BCS talent (looking for minutes) there might be some unhappy campers. Of course it sure helps when your best player...make that the HL's BEST PLAYER is on your team and sets the tone for team play.
Rossi hasnt played since high school. Not sure how that is going to affect his play. Also, I thnk most schools are going to be careful about stockpiling redshirt players. With the NCAA graduate degree free agency rule, you really do not want to invest more into a player and then see him walk away his senior year.
I realize the video of Capobianco is 4 years old, but didnt his outside shot seem very flat? He is a big one tho and should be an effective banger, but remember the HL is a skilled quick guard/small forward league. Defensive matchups might be an issue.
This team will be able to go big or go small/quick. They should be able to turn Buggs lose defensively. He was one of the main keys to last year's success. We finally had the quickest player on the floor for most games.
lowposter
Quote from: lowposter on August 03, 2012, 04:52:38 PMI realize the video of Capobianco is 4 years old, but didnt his outside shot seem very flat?
And Ryan had a very low release point. :lol:
Everything we have seen and heard about Capobianco indicates that he has a very good mid range jumper, can also hit the occasional 3 while liking to bang inside. I'll take the slightly flat shot if it goes in consistently.
I watched Bobby shoot around by himself about 2 hours before one of the games towards the end of this last season and his shot looked really smooth. I wouldn't put too much stock in a 4 year old video.
Quote from: vu84v2 on August 01, 2012, 04:14:18 PM
I've never seen Capobianco play, but if he is more like KVW it will be a change for Valpo to play offense with two post players. If that is the case, I would expect that a Broekhoff, KVW, Capobianco lineup will be rare - especially early in the season and against better opponents. If Capobianco is more mobile than KVW (not meant as a negative on KVW), then that lineup could be used more often (and could be very good).
Broekhoff is Valpo's best player and will get 30-35 minutes per game. He can play the 2, 3 or 4. KVW is the next best player and will get all of the minutes he can handle - assume 25-28 minutes per game. KVW really can only play the 5 in college unless the opponent has two low post players (rare in college). Rossi and Capobianco will get playing time around that. If Rossi is as good as people think he may be, he will either play a lot of 3 (with Broekhoff playing the 4) or will compete with the other 2's for playing time. Thus, Capobianco's flexibilty to play the 4 or 5 becomes the key since that would open up many different lineup possibilities due to the versatility of Broekhoff.
Bobby is really good. He can bang down low, but has an inside-out game. He can shoot it pretty well, has good mobility, and gets up to throw it down pretty hard too. I have pretty high expectations about how he will produce for the team.
I was just thinking how much Valpo has lacked a big strong post player who can shoot long jump shots!!! I hear Coach Woodson is on the hunt for a big strong clean up hitter who bunts well.
Quote from: cmack on August 07, 2012, 12:32:42 AM
I was just thinking how much Valpo has lacked a big strong post player who can shoot long jump shots!!! I hear Coach Woodson is on the hunt for a big strong clean up hitter who bunts well. :)
IF -and I say IF- Capo is going to used only at the 5, I would agree that he should be working almost exclusively on post moves - a Kevin McHale style up and under, a Shaq style drop step, and a Kareem style jump hook would be good for openers :). That said, as good as we were last year there were times that we were outsized and out muscled and it cost us. IMO if we hope to be great this year - not just good or even very good - a front court of Ryan, Capo and KVD has to be one of several viable combinations - maybe even a primary option. With that lineup Capo would have to have a reliable jump shot.
I agree fully with wh. Against big teams, Valpo needs to matchup better upfront and not get hammered inside. Against other opponents, the lineup wh suggests will create huge matchup problems at the three with Broekhoff (and probably at the 4 with Capobianco). With the amount of depth that this team has, there is going to be a group of players that are going to struggle to get minuntes and my guess is that it will be guards that cannot play the point.
Quote from: vu84v2 on August 07, 2012, 10:03:42 AM
I agree fully with wh. Against big teams, Valpo needs to matchup better upfront and not get hammered inside. Against other opponents, the lineup wh suggests will create huge matchup problems at the three with Broekhoff (and probably at the 4 with Capobianco). With the amount of depth that this team has, there is going to be a group of players that are going to struggle to get minuntes and my guess is that it will be guards that cannot play the point.
Early on expect intense defensive pressure from any team capable of delivering it. So until we are at full strength (or find a clear answer) I would expect that our backup minutes at the 1 and most all of our minutes at the 2 will have as much to do with ballhandling and turnovers as it has to do with hitting the jumpshot. This is because if we can get it into a half court game we should do pretty well.
Given that I have almost no idea how the available guard minutes will be divided, but I would count no one out. In fact I am almost expecting to be surprised by somebody, I just do not yet know who.
Quote from: justducky on August 07, 2012, 01:10:42 PM
Quote from: vu84v2 on August 07, 2012, 10:03:42 AM
I agree fully with wh. Against big teams, Valpo needs to matchup better upfront and not get hammered inside. Against other opponents, the lineup wh suggests will create huge matchup problems at the three with Broekhoff (and probably at the 4 with Capobianco). With the amount of depth that this team has, there is going to be a group of players that are going to struggle to get minuntes and my guess is that it will be guards that cannot play the point.
Early on expect intense defensive pressure from any team capable of delivering it. So until we are at full strength (or find a clear answer) I would expect that our backup minutes at the 1 and most all of our minutes at the 2 will have as much to do with ballhandling and turnovers as it has to do with hitting the jumpshot. This is because if we can get it into a half court game we should do pretty well.
Given that I have almost no idea how the available guard minutes will be divided, but I would count no one out. In fact I am almost expecting to be surprised by somebody, I just do not yet know who.
If I were the opposing coach, one stat would glaringly stick out from all the rest. In games where Buggs got in foul trouble early we struggled big time (see IPFW and other similar games). Nearly every game in which he got 3 fouls before half or shortly after, we lost. As justducky said, we should expect lots of ball pressure especially if Buggs gets a couple of fouls early. It will be interesting to see if Dority can negate the Buggs foul situation with his point play. While all this talk about Capo and will he start or won't he, will he play the 5 exclusively or play the 4 so Ryan can play the 3, is interesting the real issue is keeping Buggs or a similar talent on the floor.
Quote from: FWalum on August 07, 2012, 02:44:50 PMwe should expect lots of ball pressure especially if Buggs gets a couple of fouls early. It will be interesting to see if Dority can negate the Buggs foul situation with his point play.
Dority sounds like a point guard who can also play the 2 as opposed to Jay Harris who was a 2 who could also play a little 1. So I am going to assume that we should be ok when he becomes available and that his minutes may be pretty similar to Jays minutes at the 1 and 2 last year.
So how are we going to muddle through the early non-conference schedule until he can suit up? Can Will handle the back-up point? Kind of, sort of; if the pressure isn't too great. Might Boggs or Kenny get pressed into playing a little 1? It could happen. Coleman would seem to be the wildcard here, but just how good is he at playing either the 2 or the 1? Nobody seems to know. So maybe that leaves us with Tommy Kurth a true point guard who started for VU for almost an entire season as a freshman until he physically started falling apart. I just don't know how this is going to shape up but as I said earlier "count nobody out".
Now that we know for sure that Dority will be out for the first semester I would say that our odds for an at-large bid have fallen from "not bad" to "not too good" but we still have been dealt an interesting , playable hand, and many good things could happen.
Dority is the real deal, the only problem being, how many of the tough noncon games will he be eligible for? He is eligible at the end of the first semester--not the beginning of the second, an important distinction.
If classes end Dec 7, commencement is the 9th, but finals run through the 14th, does anyone know when the official "end" is?
Also: "Valpo bracket", according to Jerry Palm, last year's RPI:
Bethune-Cookman 239
Chicago State 337
UNO...unranked
sigh.
Quote from: LaPorteAveApostle on August 09, 2012, 08:40:12 AMIf classes end Dec 7, commencement is the 9th, but finals run through the 14th, does anyone know when the official "end" is?
5PM on Friday, December 14th is when Dority would officially be eligible because that's when the end of the finals period is for VU.
Bummeroo. Understandable, but still, bummeroo.
I was already plotting to get him to take classes without finals or ones that all happen on the 9th in case his being done earlier would facilitate the process : )